"old things we do they speak in a foreign language or in our mother tongue? In other words, they speak a language that needs to be decrypted at the price of a work of clarification, interpretation, translation, or a language understandable to us immediately, ie a language that resonates in this the echo of a past that is not separated from us, which is present in us, which is present in our present, then it is necessarily an eternal and therefore divine language ... This digression on the language to indicate that the language we are consubstantial, which is the cleanest to say the origin, which is the most original, is not necessarily past or present but it may well be understood as a language to come to happen. In this regard we must consider the hypothesis that the things of the past speak a language that is not as much Interrante to imagine a language that we would have lost the understanding ... It is growing a text on land that originally was not hers. And it is clear that one can say the same thing of the past. This is to acclimatize in a present, give them another chance to exist, to exist a life a little differently. Thus the things of the past speak to us both in a foreign language that must decipher, translate, interpret, and a new language, unique, unprecedented, snatched the future. "
Jean-Francois POIRIER
